Covid-19 super-spreading events play ‘outsized role’ in disease transmission, say scientists – health


Covid-19 super-spreading events, in which one person infected with the novel coronavirus transmits it to many other people, play an “outsized role” in the overall spread of the disease, according to a new study which says preventing large gatherings could significantly curb the pandemic.

The study, published in the publication PNAS, assessed approximately 60 super-spreading events, revealing that events where one person infects more than six other people are a lot more common than would be expected whether the transmission patterns followed statistical distributions commonly used in epidemiology.

Based on their findings, the scientists, including those from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the USA, developed a mathematical mannequin of Covid-19 transmission, which they used to show that limiting gatherings to 10 or fewer people could significantly minimize the overall number of infections.

“Super-spreading events are likely more important than most of us had first of all realised. Even supposing they’re extreme events, they’re probable and thus are likely occurring at a higher frequency than we thought,” said James Collins, senior writer of the new study.

“Whether we will keep watch over the super-spreading events, we have a much greater chance of getting this pandemic under keep watch over,” Collins said.

For the novel coronavirus, the scientists said the “basic reproduction number” is around three, meaning that on average, each and every person infected with the virus spreads it to approximately three other people.

Then again, they said this number varies widely from individual to individual, with some who don’t spread the disease to anyone else, while “super-spreaders” contaminate dozens of individuals.

“We figured that an analysis that’s rooted in taking a look at super-spreading events and how they happened prior to now can notify how we must suggest strategies of dealing with, and better controlling, the outbreak,” said Felix Wong, another study co-author from MIT.

In the research, the scientists defined super-spreaders as individuals who passed the virus to more than six other people. The use of this definition, they identified 45 super-spreading events from the current Covid-19 pandemic, and 15 extra instances from the 2002-03 SARS pandemic outbreak, all documented in scientific publication articles. According to the researchers, all the way through these kind of events, between 10 and 55 people were infected, but two of them, both from the 2003 outbreak, involved more than 100 people.

In most cases, events in which the disease spreads to dozens of people would be regarded as very unlikely, they said.

Then again, the MIT team found that this was once not the case for coronavirus super-spreading events. The scientists found that although super-spreading events are extreme, they’re still likely to arise.

“Which means that the probability of extreme events decays more slowly than one would have expected,” Wong said.

“These truly large super-spreading events, with between 10 and 100 people infected, are a lot more common than we had anticipated,” he added.

According to the researchers, many factors may contribute to making someone a super-spreader, including their viral load and other organic factors.

They didn’t address these factors in this study, but the scientists modelled the role of connectivity — defined as the number of people who an infected person comes into contact with.

So as to study the effects of connectivity, the scientists created and compared two mathematical network models of disease transmission. In each and every, the average number of contacts per person was once 10, but they designed one mannequin to have an exponentially declining distribution of contacts, while in the other, some people had many contacts.

The researchers found that in the latter mannequin, many more people became infected through super-spreader events.

Then again, the study famous that the transmission stopped when people with more than 10 contacts were taken out of the network and assumed to be unable to catch the virus.

Based on the results, the researchers said preventing super-spreading events could have a remarkable have an effect on on the overall transmission of Covid-19.

“It gives us a deal with as to how we could keep watch over the ongoing pandemic, which is by identifying strategies that focus on super-spreaders,” Wong said.

“One way to try this would be to, as an example, prevent anyone from interacting with over 10 people at a large gathering,” he added.

(This story has been published from a wire agency feed without modifications to the text.)

Follow more stories on Facebook and Twitter

Top stories / News


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here