As SSDs edge closer to fitting the default (and only) storage option for desktop PCs in addition to laptops, the market has filled with more affordable models. Even M.2 NVMe SSDs, which started out as exotic and expensive options aimed only at enthusiasts, are now extremely common. Along with being faster than legacy SATA SSDs, these are tiny, convenient, and save you the mess of additional wires hanging around the within of your PC cabinet. There is clearly a market for entry-level NVMe SSDs today and Kingston is aiming at precisely that with its new NV series.
Kingston NV1 SSD price in India
The Kingston NV1 SSD is equivalent to the SATA-based A and UV series with regards to positioning. It is to be had in 500GB, 1TB and 2TB capacities, and it’s interesting to see that lower capacities don’t seem to be being offered although this is an entry-level mannequin. Retail pricing for SSDs typically has nothing in common with the numbers imprinted on the labels, and also varies frequently. In India, the former two are easily found selling for around Rs. 5,499 and Rs. 9,499 respectively, while the 2TB version isn’t as widely to be had and will cost around Rs. 24,500 which isn’t as appealing with regards to cost per GB.
The simple cardboard pack proclaims that the NV1 is 35X faster than a spinning tough drive, which isn’t a high bar for any SSD to reach. You get a code to claim a free copy of Acronis True Image HD, but it’s imprinted on the within of the cardboard sandwich. This is nearly unattainable not to overlook unless you already realize it’s there, and in truth numerous people will very likely tear through it while opening the pack, since there is no indication that anything important is on the within. The software means that you can clone or image a drive, but it doesn’t reinforce incremental backups, scheduling, cloud or mobile backups, etc like retail versions of True Image.
Kingston NV1 SSD features and specifications
Kingston doesn’t make abnormal performance claims approximately the NV1, but instead simply aims to deliver high capacities at low prices. What’s most noteworthy approximately this SSD series, according to trusted source AnandTech, is that Kingston is not specifying precisely what controller you’ll be able to get or even what kind of flash reminiscence – in an effort to balance costs and inventories, the company might swap out components in different batches, and the only guarantees you have are that they are going to meet the advertised performance and endurance figures.
Other companies have been found swapping components after SSDs are launched (and reviews are published) without saying anything, and while Kingston hasn’t precisely been loud and lucid approximately wanting to do the same when advertising the NV1, it has no less than been upfront with the media that have reported this fact.
This of class lesson makes it difficult to review a product, since you might end up with something materially different if you are making your purchase a month or two down the line, and there is no make it possible for the review unit sent to Gadgets 360 will even match what’s out there at the moment. That said, Kingston is a known and trusted brand, and that alone is enough for numerous buyers. Whether you do not care approximately TLC vs QLC flash and controller bandwidth, and whether you find the capacity you wish to have at a good price, you will have to be happy enough.
Kingston claims 2100MBps sequential reads and 1700MBps sequential writes for all three capacities. This SSD uses PCIe 3.0 and not the faster, newer 4.0 standard. Endurance is rated at 120TBW, 240TBW and 480TBW for the 500GB, 1TB and 2TB capacities respectively. MTBF (Intent Time Between Failures) is 1.5 million hours. These figures are all mannered below what Kingston’s own KC2500, introduced earlier this year, offers. Even the preceding entry-level NVMe mannequin, the A2000, offers substantially better endurance ratings.
It wasn’t conceivable to identify the particular controller and flash kind on my review unit without peeling off the label covering the actual chips on the module, and Kingston has not published these details. Some third-party reports propose that the lower capacity drives will use TLC flash while higher ones will use QLC flash, but that could change at any point. We will be able to’t verify what the bandwidth of the controller is, but we will be able to safely suppose that there is no DRAM cache. There’s also no mention of encryption on the official spec sheet. We’re going to have to rely on performance alone to assess this drive.
The Kingston NV1 is a very basic SSD and so it doesn’t come with a heat spreader. The circuit board itself is bright blue and looks nice enough but you will not see much of it once it’s installed. Since it is a one-sided M.2 module and is only 2.1mm thick, it’ll fit into tight spaces such as ultra-slim laptops.
Kingston NV1 SSD performance.
The Kingston NV1 used to be benchmarked on an open rig consisting of >>>>. All Windows updates and drivers were the latest released versions at the time of this review. Windows reported the drive’s formatted capacity as 465.76GB.
Starting with CrystalDiskMark 6, we saw sequential read and write speeds of 2,553MBps and 1,959MBps respectively which are a reasonable bit higher than I expected based on the official specifications. This is usually a cushion built in in order that future revisions remain inside the advertised performance threshold. Random reads and writes were measured at 1370.6MBps and 1447.4MBps which isn’t poor at all. This is fairly a lot faster than today’s premium SATA SSDs such as the Samsung SSD 870 Evo, but at the back of the impressive Kingston KC2500.
The Anvil benchmark reported read and write scores of 4,674.33 and 6,827.63 respectively, for a complete of 11,501.96. In a real-world Windows dossier copy test the usage of an 80GB folder of assorted files, write speed touched 345MBps and stayed reasonably stable at approximately that level with very large files, but dropped as little as 15MBps with assorted small files.
It’s worth noting that even the newest version of Kingston’s own SSD Manager software, downloaded from its website, did not detect this drive. It used to be unable to show diagnostic information or any security-related options.
There are questions that remain regarding the long-term viability of the Kingston NV1. I would not use this as a boot drive for my main work PC or store my most important data on it without a rock-solid backup plan in place, but that does not intent no one else will have to make a selection it. This would be a great inexpensive upgrade for an older PC or laptop that’s serving non-critical needs, and it may be a very good secondary or tertiary drive for saving large game install folders to since they’re going to get pleasure from quick loads.
What makes it most appealing is its low pricing, besides, there are other models that are more affordable and have unambiguous spec sheets, most notably the The most important P1 and WD Blue SN550. Kingston’s own A2000 costs only Rs. 100-200 more. Considering that this mannequin is reasonably new in the Indian market, I am hoping to see much better pricing a couple of months down the line. This SSD effectively creates a new, lower product tier so with the correct pricing, it can certainly carve out a niche for itself.
That said, performance is fairly good and endurance will have to be enough for most low-impact home and office PC use cases. You’d save fairly a bit of money in comparison to something mainstream like the Kingston KC2500 or Samsung SSD 970 Evo Plus.
500GB: Rs. 5,499
1TB: Rs. 9,499
2TB: Rs. 24,500
Good overall performance Rather affordable
Core specifications subject to change Disappointing endurance ratings No encryption No management software
Ratings (Out of 5)
Performance: 4 Value for Money: 3.5 Overall: 3.5