Gopal Singh Visharad, one in every of those who had filed the civil suit over the Ayodhya land title, on Tuesday approached the Supreme Court to request an early hearing of the case. He told the government that the mediators appointed by the top court earlier this year had not been ready to make much progress.
Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, who used to be heading a bench of judges, told Gopal Singh Visharad’s lawyer that he would look into the request.
The top court had set up a mediation panel in March this year and mandated the three-member group led by retired pass judgement on FM Khalifullah to explore the possibilities of arriving at a negotiated settlement to the dispute that has also shaped the country’s politics.
In May, Justice FM Khalifullah returned to the Supreme Court to seek more time. Its new deadline expires on August 15.
Gopal Singh Visharad’s request to the top court is in line with the ruling BJP and the Uttar Pradesh government’s push for an early decision.
When the suggestion for mediation used to be first made, the Uttar Pradesh government and the Hindu parties, aside from the Nirmohi Akhara, a devout denomination that is likely one of the main parties to the civil suit, had objected it. The Muslim side in the dispute, on the other hand, had welcomed the top court’s initiative.
Also Read : Ayodhya case mediation explained
The judges had, on the other hand, explained that they wanted to give mediation a chance in an attempt to “heal relationships”.
The top court is hearing petitions challenging a 2010 Allahabad High Court order that trifurcated the 2.77-acre-site between the Nirmohi Akhara, the Sunni Central Waqf Board, and Ram Lalla [the child deity]. The court could also be considering a petition by the Centre, which wants to release 67.7 acres of land acquired in 1993 around the site — aside from for .303 acres on which the actual disputed constitution stood — to its original owners.
Also Read | Yet another possibility to amicably unravel Ram temple tangle: Opinion
Jul 09, 2019 10:52 IST