A department-related standing committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice headed by Bhupender Yadav, a member of the Rajya Sabha (RS) and the national general secretary of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), on Friday suggested that virtual court proceedings must be allowed to continue beyond the coronavirus disease (Covid-19) pandemic as polite.
The panel said virtual proceedings can also be extended permanently to more than a few appellate tribunals such as Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT), Highbrow Property Appellate Board (IPAB), and National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) etc located across the country, which do not require personal appearances of the parties and advocates.
In an interview to HT, Yadav spoke approximately the need for virtual courts and what interventions are needed on the ground to cause them to work. Edited excerpts:
Are virtual courts here to stay?
There is not any alternative to physical courts. Courts are a place for administration of justice. Virtual courts supply services and products relating to filing of documents, presenting evidence and other procedural mechanisms. It can at best be called a supplemental toolkit for speedy and effective dispensation of justice by reducing the pendency of cases. The idea is to find a balance between dispensation of justice, pendency of cases and giving speedy justice to the public.
There were concerns expressed by the Bar Council of India (BCI) and Delhi High Court Bar Organization that virtual courts may leave out many litigants who are bad with no access to the internet. How have you addressed that?
It is true that a majority of advocates and litigants, particularly from the rural parts of the country, don’t have adequate infrastructure such as computers, laptops and high-speed internet connection required for virtual hearing of cases. This problem spans across accessibility, connectivity and want of skill and knowledge quotients.
The main challenge is to bridge the divide relating to accessibility, connectivity and skill-set required to use digital platforms.
To address these issues, many steps such as establishment of e-seva kendras in the HCs and in district courts to supply assistance and information to lawyers and litigants and facilitating e-filing have been taken.
Also Read: ‘Govt’s focus is on giving services and products to those in need’, says BJP’s Bhupender Yadav
Did the committee borrow ideas approximately virtual courts from other countries?
From technological advancement the earliest reference of virtual courts is found in other parts of the world and countries such as the USA of The usa (USA) and Singapore have used them. We have also done numerous work on this aspect like conducting remand affairs through virtual courts to prevent movement of prisoners between courts and jails.
We have effectively used virtual courts all through the Covid-19-induced lockdown period, where more than 18 lakh cases were registered across the country, of which almost eight lakhs have been disposed of. So, we can use the technology for the administration of justice in our case as polite.
In the absence of a vaccine for Covid-19, there’s a insight that the pandemic is here to stay. Courts being places where social distancing norms are tough to practice; how does the committee plan on striking a balance between virtual and steady hearings?
We are amid a pandemic but certainly have to renew our normal functioning. There is not any denying that technology is very effective in ensuring transparency and good governance. After the 1990s, our laws have developed more on the regulatory mechanisms framework. Particularly with the coming of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and other such laws have helped us fortify our ease of doing trade rankings.
We need to strike a balance between effective dispensation of justice and expedited disposal of cases. Thus, under Phase II of e-court projects we suggest to have committed central video conferencing infrastructure for courts, advocates, strengthening of e-filing infrastructure and plenty of other things.
But in all this, lawyers are fundamental stakeholders and they’ll be a part of each consultative and decision-making process.
Also Read: JP Nadda to chair assembly of Bihar BJP MPs, senior leaders to finalise meeting ballot strategy
High pendency rates in courts are a long-standing concern. Do you see a role for virtual courts here?
Justice delayed is justice denied, but justice hurried may be justice buried. I consider that virtual courts can also be an effective medium to balance between these two extremes and supply expeditious and quality justice. We will be able to transfer sure categories of cases to virtual courts to effectively minimize the pendency of overburdened physical courts. Virtual courts can aid us in distributive justice by ensuring accessibility and affordability and location and economic factors must not be an obstacle for those people living in remote and far-flung areas from access to justice. The virtual courts would also help achieve our national commitment of achieving sustainable development goal (SDG) targets such as access to justice for all.